In just a few weeks, Democrats will be in control of the house and senate. George Bush will officially be the lamest of lame ducks, and not responsible to the US voters ever again.
OK, think about that one. Take some time with it.
think
think
think
OK? Got that picture in your head?
So, politically Bush is done. Now he's got 24 months to work for one thing and one thing only: Historical Legacy. And the only thing he'll be in charge of is the US military. The Commander in Chief. Not responsible to Congress.
And this all-time least popular president really will have nothing to lose at that point. And the way he sees it, Truman became unpopular in his day, but years later people appreciate the tough decision he had to make.
Bush sees his legacy as bringing democracy and freedom to the middle east (shh.. oil). Iraq was just the appetizer. Iran is the main course (shh.. oil). And Bush is all about settling scores - first the one with Iraq, who tried to kill his daddy. But Iran, oh, Iran, man, do we have a score to settle there. 444 ring a bell? And he's already told us he's going in:
"We pledge we'll continue to work together to stop the world's most dangerous men from getting their hands on the world's most dangerous weapons"
"The free world is sending the regime in Tehran a clear message. We are not going to allow Iran to have nuclear weapons"
So get ready America, pack your bags, we're going to Iran. We need a fill-up.
45 comments:
He's A duck and you're a quack.
Hey Blog Mogul you renting an upstairs or downstairs apartment?
"The free world is sending the regime in Tehran a clear message. We are not going to allow Iran to have nuclear weapons"
HA HA HA. But that's exactly what they did!
Thanks to our genius Congressional Republicans and the BushAdm---they printed one of Saddam's old secret memos on
"How To Make An Atomic Bomb" IN ARABIC, ON THE INTERNET !!!!!!
After the New York Times noticed it in the dumps of Iraqi captured documents, and showed it to nuclear experts, they said the information was definitely well beyond the normal things that are publicly known, i.e. it is clearly specific nuclear weapons engineering which would be quite classified in any nuclear weapons state.
More irony: all the document dumps show evidence of Saddam actually attempting to comply fully with the UN weapons inspectors after the 1st gulf war.
I wonder if Rush Limbaugh is going to blame this on Michael J Fox and them Democrats too.
And how are we paying for all of this?
Stop thinking like a queer and then you will get what's going on in the world. Get it got it? Didn't think so.
Weapons of mass destruction = Iranian oil bourse
Evil regimes = those regimes that question that the ever declining $US should not be the worlds reserve currency.
What has Bush done...
Handed one of the worlds largest oil fields to IRAN on a silver platter.
Was this the intent of the puppet masters (Bildeberg, Illuminate, BG, SB, IMF, CFR) - yes and no...
Too much death - as Keith Olbermann has - they ran out of plan in two months....nonetheless I am still not convinced IRAN is not in the fold and is no more than a red herring.
Slow down - Keith this is not limited just to Iran: I have posted before that Israels bombing of Lebanon was to protect oil pipeline routes from the Caspian region (poo pooed here of course).
If ANYONE thinks the current US positioning in the Caspian Region through the middle east is NOT about oil...better get your head checked. It is called the OIL GRAB.
Hamas begins firing antitank missiles from the West Bank
November 2, 2006, 12:19 AM (GMT+02:00)
Exclusive to DEBKAfile’s military sources: While the IDF continues “Operation Autumn Clouds” in Beit Hanun, and Qassam rockets continue to fall on Sderot and the Western Negev, Hamas has begun to fire rockets from the West Bank at Israeli targets.
The IDF on Wednesday, Nov. 1, refuted an announcement by the Salah a-Din Brigades, the military wing of the Popular Resistance Committees, that on Wednesday morning it had fired a short-range Nasser 1 rocket at the settlement of Migdalim, east of Ariel in Samaria. However, senior officers in Central Command told DEBKAfile’s military sources that the Palestinians, for the first time, fired an antitank missile at an Israeli settlement, adding that it had been smuggled into the West Bank from the Gaza Strip or the Sinai Peninsula.
According to the officers, Hamas has devoted tremendous resources to opening a second front by firing short-range missiles at Israeli targets from the West Bank, and has already succeeded in stockpiling a “not insignificant” number of such missiles. “The first instance of the firing of such a missile took place early Wednesday morning at 4 a.m., and now it will escalate,” one officer said.
Another officer said: “What we said was that we didn’t find the missile fragments in the field. However, just because we didn’t find them doesn’t mean we don’t know what the Palestinians are up to. The missile was definitely fired, and without any doubt this heralds the opening of a new period of warfare in the West Bank and within the Green Line.”
Hey Keith - the protests you have been clammering about have begun - albeit in an unanticipated genre of protestors. See US GIs revolting after QUEENSRYCHE.
REVOLUTION CALLING
Music and Lyrics by Geoff Tate & Michael Wilton
For a price I'd do about anything except pull the trigger
For that I'd need a pretty good cause
Then I heard of Dr. X, the man with the cure
Just watch the television... Yeah, you'll see there's something going on
Got no love for politicians, Or that crazy scene in D.C.
It's just a power mad town
But the time is ripe for changes, There's a growing feeling
That taking a chance on a new kind of vision is due
I used to trust the media to tell me the truth, tell us the truth
But now I've seen the payoffs everywhere I look
Who do you trust when everyone's a crook?
Revolution calling, Revolution calling, Revolution calling you
[There's a] Revolution calling, Revolution calling
Gotta make a change, gotta push, gotta push it on through
I'm tired of all this bullshit they keep selling me on T.V. About the communist plan
And all the shady preachers begging for my cash
Swiss bank accounts while giving their secretaries the slam
They're all in Penthouse now or Playboy magazine, million dollar stories to tell
I guess Warhol wasn't wrong fame fifteen minutes long
Everyone's using everybody, making the sale
I used to think that only America's way, way was right
But now the holy dollar rules everybody's lives
Gotta make a million doesn't matter who dies
Revolution calling, Revolution calling, Revolution calling you
[There's a] Revolution calling, Revolution calling
Gotta make a change, Gotta push, gotta push it on through
I used to trust the media to tell me the truth, tell us the truth
But now I've seen the payoffs everywhere I look
Who do you trust when everyone's a crook?
Revolution calling, Revolution calling, Revolution calling you
[There's a] Revolution calling, Revolution calling
Gotta make a change, Gotta push, gotta push it on through
There's something happening here
A new protest movement inside the military -- including active-duty soldiers back from Iraq -- is calling on Congress to end the war immediately.
By Mark Benjamin
http://www.salon. com/news/ feature/2006/ 11/02/mil_ protest/print. html
Nov. 02, 2006 | An extraordinary full-page antiwar ad appeared in the Sunday edition of the New York Times on Nov. 9, 1969. In it, 1,366 active-duty U.S. service members signed a statement calling for an end to the war in Vietnam. The signatures represented a tiny minority of the 3.5 million troops serving on active duty then -- but behind those signatures was a groundswell of dissent inside the military. With the Vietnam adventure sliding into an abyss, that dissent would become more apparent as an Army that included many conscripts faced ugly resistance from within: soldiers disobeying orders, deserting, using drugs, and even "fragging" their own officers with grenades.
“ Some Americans believe that this was a “war for oil,” but there is hardly any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure. According to Philip Zelikow, a member of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (2001‐2003), executive director of the 9/11 Commission, and now Counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the “real threat” from Iraq was not a threat to the United States.139 The “unstated threat” was the “threat against Israel,” Zelikow told a University of Virginia audience in September 2002, noting further that “the American government doesn’t want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell.”
“ For the past several decades, however, and especially since the Six Day War in 1967, the centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy has been its relationship with Israel. The combination of unwavering U.S. support for Israel and the related effort to spread democracy throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and eopardized U.S. security. “
Read the entire research paper here
GOP may keep Senate.
Dems will take house!
In RESPONSE to a question to ExxonMobile president on CONCLUSION of Cheney's Secret Energy meeting..
"The Iraqi Oil fields?...Sure WE'D LOVE to be ABLE get our Hands on them !"
They estimated Iraqi oil could be extracted for Well UNDER $2.00 per BARREL !
I DON'T think he was Excited about "Freedom Fries or "Purple Fingers" ..but You BE the Judge !
I am a democrat. I want Bush to bomb Iran back to the stone age.
Tom posted an article that stated, "Instead, the war was motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure."
I would agree in the sense that Israel is a major player in the "oil grab" and that to keep it secure makes sense to accomplish this goal (of grabbng oil).
Here is what our Bilderberg Buddy Henery Kissinger had to say in 1977 related to "Arab" oil....followed by a fairly telling quote related to a pretext for war in the ME.
"Oil is much too important a commodity to be left in the hands of the Arabs."
Henry Kissinger, 1973
More from our prince of death....
"I can think of no faster way to unite the American people behind George W. Bush than a terrorist attack on an American target overseas. And I believe George W. Bush will quickly unite the American people through his foreign policy."
-Henry Kissinger, appearing on CNBC, 2000-Dec-13
FYI - I'm rooting deep down for us and Israel to bomb the crap out of Iran.
No troops, no invasion. Just destroy anything to do with nukes, try to kill their leaders too
Make them respect our author-a-taaa
And I think that's what's gonna happen, in 2007
The march to war starts next week
"No troops, no invasion. Just destroy anything to do with nukes, try to kill their leaders too"
Keith - it is statements like this that make you look a fool.
I doubt Bubble W will be invading Iran. For some intersting insite into the subject, check out Micheal Leeden, he's written a lot about Iran and the People there.
or this link:
Regime Change Iran: http://www.regimechangeiran.com/
(students blogging in Iran)
Agreed,
Keith stop acting like a fool.
Now that you are into gold Keith I entirely understand why you want an attack (oh but don't hurt the little children).
Here's the equation:
Bomb + closing/mining S of H = $300 oil = Keith a very rich man.
VERY SHALLOW KEITH.
Borkafatty for President!!!
--------------
If i were I would hire all you Hp'ers for my Congress, this would be my cabinet in no specific order:
Butch: Vice President
Keith : Secretary of the Treasury
LauraVella: Secretary of State
Richard: Department of Defense
Buzz Saw: Homeland Security
David in JAX:Secretary of Education
Metroplexual:Secretary of Labor
Forecloseme: Attorney General
FlyingMonkeyWarrior:Secretary of Transportation
panicearly:Secretary of the Interior
And the rest of the hack jobs go to the : Anonymous posters.
cheers!
My take on Iran - they're moving toward a nuke, have threatened Israel with extinction, and are ignoring the authority of the UN
So, pretty easy one there - bomb 'em if they don't stop.
But alas, after the Iraq debacle, I'm not sure anyone has the stomach for it.
Yes, I'm a hawk. But with war, I believe in playing to win, mercilessly if need be, and having an exit strategy. The opposite of Iraq.
Keith, if we attack Iran, our troops in Iraq are f_cked. The green zone will come under all out attack from Miqtada Al Sadr and all holy hell will break loose in the rest of the Shiite areas. We had better wait on the whole Iran attack until we get our ground troops out of the region.
"My take on Iran - they're moving toward a nuke, have threatened Israel with extinction, and are ignoring the authority of the UN"
Who does not want a nuke Keith ? With our imperialist cabal government - everyone desires a nuke.
You see Keith - in the US attempt to discourage proliferation of Nukes (as with "terrorism") it has in fact fed the fire.
UNder your criteria Keith - only Israel and the US should have nucs to keep all the proles in line.
Keith - be careful here - your true colors may show.
keith said...
FYI - I'm rooting deep down for us and Israel to bomb the crap out of Iran.
No troops, no invasion. Just destroy anything to do with nukes, try to kill their leaders too
Make them respect our author-a-taaa
I think I saw a movie once where the character playing the standing president of the US said:
"Today the US people will decide this countries future. And tomorrow I will decide Morocco's"
Is it something within the english (and their decendants - ie american) mentality that they just love to be boss?
Imagine if a frenchman said...
"We should bomb all of ze nuclear sites in Israel. Zey must respect the french authoratee!"
You know... most normal people would probably say... "Stupid f!ked up french man. Must have gone batty from drinking all that mummy tea from egypt."
Just bomb... just destroy... just kill...
Sounds like a terrorist to me.
could be part of the great plan. war games in the gulf spark an "accident" an "attack" and justification for an air attack on iran. then the usmc open the doors of hell on that punk ass sadir towel head and no need to woory about what the press says, it becomes "open season" on ragheads. usmc cleans the entire region, we start pumping oil by q4 2007, oil drops in price the recession ends by 2008 repubs walk into the white house with a ticker tape parade and we all will get back into our escalades and live hapilly ever after.
Anonymous above...
Insanity on the cusp of madness...
With the Americans and NATO getting their asses kicked in both Iraq and Afghanistan, does anyone still believe that they can win in Iran?
oh, after 2000 posts, you should know my true colors by now
as to the point on getting our troops out of harms way before we unleash hell in iran - couldn't agree more. get them out today I say
"does anyone still believe that they can win in Iran?"
It has never been about winning...it has been about dividing.
This strategy will be employed to turn americans on americans in the near future police state.
In just a few weeks, Democrats will be in control of the house and senate. George Bush will officially be the lamest of lame ducks, and not responsible to the US voters ever again.
OK, think about that one. Take some time with it.
I've given this matter some thought and have come to the conclusion that it is impossible to make an accurate prediction regarding the outcome of the upcoming election. At first, it seemed that the Republicans would need an October Event to get the 9/11 hysteria going again. But, with the election coming up in a few days, the need for an "only Republicans can save you from terrorism" event seems unnecessary. Such an event will be unnecessary because the elections will be rigged, with the Republicans winning in both the house and senate.
Was the presidential election of 2004 rigged? All of the cats were out of the bag before this election: We knew that the Bush administration used lies to justify launching a preemptive military strike against a country which posed no immediate threat to the US. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein had no ties to al-Qaeda, etc. The American people knew that their president had lied to them and caused the unnecessary deaths of thousands of Iraqis and hundreds of US service men and women. Yet, we are expected to believe that informed voters "elected" George "Stay The Course" Bush to second term.
Kerry’s Losing Campaign: Incompetence or Conspiracy?
"Is John Kerry throwing the election to his fellow BONESMAN George Bush, who is also member of a secret society called the Order of Skull and Bones? The evidence suggests that he certainly is. The fact that he hasn’t hired any competent consultants like Jim Carville certainly suggests that he is not putting his all into this campaign fight. To the informed observer, it certainly appears that this so-called incompetence may be more calculated than inadvertent."
The above statement can be applied to both the 2004 presidential election as well as to this month, when Kerry's latest statements regarding Bush's idiocy and incompetence were twisted by Republicans to insult the US military.
We won't know the results of the upcoming election until Wednesday, November 8, 2006. I sincerely hope that I am wrong, but Republican hopes of retaining control of both houses of Congress look increasingly likely.
British believe Bush is more dangerous than Kim Jong-il
· US allies think Washington threat to world peace
· Only Bin Laden feared more in United Kingdom
Julian Glover
Friday November 3, 2006
The Guardian
The ICM poll ranks the US president with some of his bitterest enemies as a cause of global anxiety.
America is now seen as a threat to world peace by its closest neighbours and allies, according to an international survey of public opinion published today that reveals just how far the country's reputation has fallen among former supporters since the invasion of Iraq.
Carried out as US voters prepare to go to the polls next week in an election dominated by the war, the research also shows that British voters see George Bush as a greater danger to world peace than either the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il, or the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Both countries were once cited by the US president as part of an "axis of evil", but it is Mr Bush who now alarms voters in countries with traditionally strong links to the US.
The survey has been carried out by the Guardian in Britain and leading newspapers in Israel (Haaretz), Canada (La Presse and Toronto Star) and Mexico (Reforma), using professional local opinion polling in each country.
Keith,
When you talk about settling scores and accounts, you seem to have a selective memory. What about the scores Iran has to settle? If you remember, the US 'accidently' shot down a civilian Iran Air plane killing almost 300 innocent passengers. Not only was an official apology not issued to the Iranian nation, but a few years later, to add insult to injury, the captain of the ship was awarded a length of service medal.
What about the score Iran has to settle for the Kermit Roosevelt led CIA orchestrated coup d'etat of a democratically elected leader (Mosaddeq ring a bell?)to re-install the despotic shah in order to protect British and American oil interests? A long history of meddling in the affairs of oil producing countries tallies up to a large debt account, wouldn't you say Keith?
As they say, historical memories in the US run back only a couple of decades, whereas in the Middle East they run back millenia.
It has never been about winning...it has been about dividing.
This strategy will be employed to turn americans on americans in the near future police state.
Sorry... but the process of dividing the lambs from the goats started with Cain and Abel.
Wake up - the enemy is WITHIN your gates. A traitor is 100 times more devestating because he IS your countryman.
Will you be standing with Keith as he screams "Bomb them, kill them!" because he is your countryman?
Will you pull the trigger and blow a foreign kid's brains out because
you don't want your nation divided?
Or will you finally turn your gun on the a-holes who have been goading you into war so that they can keep living the high-life?
When the police state comes - you will only have a few choices. Either you support the tyranny, or you will have to try and destroy that tyranny (which means going against your countrymen). Or you can run away...
People like Keith complain about the tyranny and Dubya only when they step on his toes. Otherwise it's "Bomb, KILL, Destroy! Let's show-dem ragheads what we Amerikuns are really made of! YEEE_HAW!!!" However he is in the majority.
In the end... if your America has degenerated to what the Soviet empire used to be... is it even worth saving?
There are some allegiances that go ABOVE the one you have to your country or your fellow men. Namely - the allegiance to the truth and to yourself. So that when you wake up you can look at yourself in the mirror and not see a murderer.
Richard,
Check Oct thread. Post and audio for you.
"There are some allegiances that go ABOVE the one you have to your country or your fellow men. Namely - the allegiance to the truth and to yourself. So that when you wake up you can look at yourself in the mirror and not see a murderer."
Great post anon - thanks - you are spot on!!!!
FWM
are you trying to seduce me with that new pic?
it's working ;)
We will be at war with Iran within six months, it's a lock.
FMW, can we see a little leg?
Thanks Richard, Dick to Most,
Just wanted to make sure I was not called 'monkey boy' or 'Infidel Woman in Drag' again.
Hon Jew,
Cat Suit Anime leg is all your gonna get.
When we have a nuclear 9/11, people will regret not having invaded Iran.
We will have a nuclear 9/11, but probably when we have a president like Jimmy Carter who will just turn the other cheek after Manhattan disappears under a mushroom cloud.
Expect a civil war after that.
Kweef:
why are you erasing the posts from Honica Jewinski? We were having a discussion about a nuclear 9/11 and you're screwing it up.
The multi-cultis say: Let he who is without pigment cast no stones!
Bombing lebanon was about oil? What oil pipelines are in Lebanon?
Iraqi oil isn't in "US hands". It's owned by Iraq, not Saddam Hussein. The Iraqi gov't gets the money, not saddam, that's the only difference.
The $2.00 per barrel is a LIFTING COST. It implies that Iraqi oil is easy to pump (whereas oil sands in Canada are about $30 a barrel to produce). It doesn't mean that the US gets oil for $2.00. The idea was that Iraqi oil production would expand and thus keep the price down. Break the back of OPEC so to speak.
Iraq sells about $40 billion in oil per year. At $60 per barrel. And they keep the money, not the US gov't. So how is it "about oil" again? How does it benefit big oil, or the US consumer to have the US in Iraq? They were pumping MORE oil before the war....back when prices were $20 a barrel, remember?
I see so much illogic it's just mind bogggling.
If we bomb Iran it will make oil MORE expensive, not less. Even if we invaded, which is unlikely, we wouldn't exactly "keep" the oil.
We blew lots of foreign kids' brains out during WWII and it worked wonders!
The job of our government is not to protect foreign kids. Besides, those "foreign kids" want to make a snuff film with you as the star.
George Bush: lame duck
John Kerry, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy:
lame Dicks
Dems are going to win Senate. Yahh right..................
Dems are going to win the Senate?
Dream on.
Post a Comment