Showing posts with label bagholders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bagholders. Show all posts

October 15, 2007

RTC2? Banks in desperate $80 billion scramble to avoid "mark to market" meltdown. Just delaying the inevitable


I love how everyone (especially Wall Street and CNBC) thinks the credit crunch is over, and all will be just fine. The banks reporting of billions in write-downs last week was greeted as good news. Too bad those write-downs were just a fraction of the truth.

The news this morning will also be spun as good news. Hopefully some in the MSM will do their jobs and dig a bit deeper. This is the banks trying to save themselves, but the problem still remains - trillions are being lost on the housing crash and someone is holding the bag.


We've only just begun HP'ers. This isn't a $80 billion problem. No, it's in the trillions. Many trillions. And the worst is yet to come. And when the truth finally comes out, it will shock you.

Banks to set up $80 bln fund to limit credit crunch

NEW YORK/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Major banks including Citigroup Inc are looking at setting up a roughly $80 billion fund to buy ailing mortgage securities and other assets, in a bid to prevent the credit crunch from further hurting the global economy, sources familiar with the matter said.

Representatives from the U.S. Treasury have organized conversations among top global banks, sources said, as financial institutions grow increasingly concerned that a certain type of investment fund linked to banks may have to dump billions of dollars of repackaged loans onto financial markets.

A fire-sale of assets could lift borrowing costs globally, trigger big losses from investors and force banks to further write down some holdings on their balance sheets. Such sales could trigger huge losses for banks, and in the worst-case scenario tip the U.S. or Europe into recession.

"We are coming off the greatest lending bubble ... in U.S. history. We will feel its impact for a very long time," said Robert Arnott, Chairman of Research Affiliates LLC in Pasadena, California, earlier this month.

More here...

“For me, this is more of a P.R. blitz,” he said. The banks are “saying, it’s not just that we are doing this on an ad hoc, individual basis. Rather, we have a plan and consortium in cooperation with Treasury, which gives it a veneer of respectability.”

Mr. Stracke said that by serving as another buyer of the highest-rated securities, the banks are hoping to ease the immediate strain on SIVs, which could be forced to sell billions of dollars worth of assets in a fire sale if they are not able to raise new financing and when their capital falls below certain thresholds. The effort, however, will not resolve the longer-term problem many SIVs face with more risky mortgage bonds, he said.

September 03, 2007

A HousingPANIC message to the failed Housing Gamblers of America: You made your bet, you lost, now send in the keys and run

Hey, you made a bad bet and you lost. You lied about your income and took out a no-down, no-doc, interest-only, teaser-rate, piggyback negative amortization loan (good god does anyone remember 30 year fixed?).

You bought a mansion you had NO BUSINESS living in at your income level, you bet prices would go up and instead they cratered, and now you can no longer make your reset payment.

Who cares!!! You're not the bagholder! Hedge funds, foreign banks, US taxpayers, insurance companies and people all over the world are! But not you, no way no how!!! Party time!!

So just walk away. Send in the keys. Jingle mail. Ah, the American Dream!!!

Since there's no such thing as personal responsibility, ethics or morals anymore in America, you get off scott-free. Just walk away, stop hemorrhaging cash, and try to keep as many of your ill-gotten gains as you can.

I hope you transferred some of your cash-out-housing-ATM-refi-loot to unmarked Swiss bank accounts. I hope you bought lots and lots of stuff that you can now put on eBay. And a few years from now, don't forget to pull the same scam again!

Sleep tight!

February 26, 2007

HousingPANIC Stupid Question of the Day


The buyers of "prime" debt these past few years (hedge funds, China, etc) thought they were buying stable well-researched loans, because they were 80/20 (or so they thought).

The problem (as the bag holders will now find out) is that they homedebtor who took out the loan actually put 0% down. He got a second or piggyback loan from another lender for the other 20%.

So Prime actually equals Subprime in many cases. Maybe the majority of cases.

My question is, why isn't this being reported, and why do "analysts" state that they don't expect the Subprime meltdown to spill over to Prime, when we all know that they're one and the same?