September 09, 2008

HousingPANIC calls for an independent investigation of Senator Chris Dodd, the bribed Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking and Housing

* Illegally take money from Angelo Mozilo and Countrywide - check

* Draft legislation giving Fannie and Freddie more power even while he knew they would eventually fail - check

* Doing nothing while the biggest asset bubble in American history raged - check

When we look back on the Great Housing Ponzi Scheme, the one person with the most fingerprints on the corpse may very well be Senator Dodd.


10 comments:

Anonymous said...

heard him interviewed on either C-S-SPAN or NPR yesterday, he claimed to have no clue the Fed/Treasury was going to take over the GSEs until days ago despite being Chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs committee... so you can add "(willful or gross) negligence" to his list.

willful negligence: Intentional performance of an unreasonable act in disregard of a known risk, making it highly probable that harm will be caused. Willful negligence usually involves a conscious indifference to the consequences. There is no clear distinction between willful negligence and gross negligence.

Anonymous said...

This is from Huffingtonpost Must read from Bernie Sanders:
The corporate media would have us believe, based on their coverage, that the most important issues in this presidential campaign are political tactics and the "character" of the four candidates. But what is at stake right now is not primarily the life stories of Barack Obama, John McCain, Joe Biden or Sarah Palin. An election is not a soap opera which deals with the trials and tribulations of the candidates and their family members. Election coverage must not descend into becoming a pre-game football show, one which deals only with "who's going to win" polling data and never-ending tactical discussions of "what the candidate must do" to win this or that state.

In a democracy, elections are not beauty pageants or reality shows, or soap operas for political junkies. Elections are the real business of democracy, and they should be about real things.

Without sounding too corny, what this election is about is the well-being of hundreds of millions of Americans and about what kind of country we will be leaving to our kids and grandchildren. And, at a time of global warming and severe environmental problems, this campaign is also about whether our planet survives in a condition that can sustain human life in the decades and centuries to come.

Given all that is at stake, as American citizens we must demand that the media not continue to trivialize our democratic process, dumb down coverage and, in the process, deflect attention away from the most important issues impacting our lives. This election must, first and foremost, be about the needs of the American people. As Vermont's senator and the longest-serving Independent in American congressional history, let me lay out what I believe some of those issues are:

In the United States today, the middle-class is shrinking, poverty is increasing and the gap between the very rich and everyone else is growing wider. There are many economists who believe that, if we do not reverse course, for the first time in modern history our children will have a lower standard of living than their parents. Our country also has the dubious distinctions of having both the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world and more people in jail than any other country. Question: What specific ideas do the candidates have as to how we can grow the middle class and create good paying jobs, while protecting our children and the most vulnerable members of our society?

In the United States today, 46 million Americans have no health insurance, even more are underinsured, and we are the only major country on earth without universal coverage. Health care costs are soaring despite the fact that we already spend twice as much per person as any other country. Many employers, large and small, are now cutting back on the coverage they provide their employees making a tough economy even tougher for millions of workers. Question: Do the candidates believe that all Americans are entitled to health care as a right of citizenship? What are their plans for assuring that quality health care is delivered in a cost-effective manner?

Most of the leading scientists in the world believe that global warming, if not reversed, will lead to severe weather disturbances, flooding, drought, hunger, and mass human migration. These scientists also believe that global warming is a more threatening problem than previously perceived, and that bold action is needed to reverse greenhouse gas emissions. Question: Do the candidates believe that global warming is real and a man-made phenomenon? If so, what specific actions are they proposing to reverse global warming? On a related energy issue, what ideas do they have to make our country energy independent?

The United States is now in the sixth year of the war in Iraq, the Taliban is gaining military strength in Afghanistan, the political situation in Pakistan is becoming more unstable, Russia and Georgia have just completed a bloody war, and little progress has been made in easing tensions between Israel and her neighbors. Question: What are the principles that will guide the candidates' foreign policy? What specific steps will they take to combat international terrorism? How will they restore America's position in the international community and help create a more peaceful world?

These are just a few of the major issues facing our nation. I realize there are many more. It seems to me that no matter what our political views are, or what we may consider the most important issues to be, as a democratic society we must demand of the media and the candidates that this campaign focus on the great challenges facing our country and the world. Gossip, melodrama and political tactics just won't do

This says it all....

Anonymous said...

don't forget John McCain's links to this. lobbyists are all over his campaign.

McCain Op-Ed: Lobbyists Like My Campaign Manager Are ‘Primary Contributors’ To Fannie-Freddie Crisis
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/09/mccain-lobby-fannie-freddie/

"at least 20 McCain fundraisers have lobbied on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” in recent years."

Anonymous said...

Mccains are thieves?
Cindy McCains steals perscriptive drugs.
Cindy steals receipes claiming they are hers.
Cindy steals a husband to another women.
John steals Barack Obama's theme of Change...
Americans are just plain stupid.

Anonymous said...

come on, that is just a start.

fannie and freddie need to be completely investigated. Isn't it kind of wrong for the GSEs to pay to lobby congress? or any politician?

Anonymous said...

Any time the tax payer needs to pony up tens of billions of dollars there needs to be a complete and independent investigation.

Anonymous said...

The taxpayer bailout of F&F is a desperate attempt to forestall/prevent a full investigation.

The stench of political corruption is all over this fraudulent bailout.

Anonymous said...

I say that we throw the dude in jail, Keith. He was the ring leader of this housing bail-out bill, which is nothing but a big boondoggle, just like Bushco's first bail-out bill. He got that super-sweet loan from countrywide. BTW, you or I or anyone else don't get these perks. He says that he didn't read all the writing on that cut rate loan from Countrywide that he got. He was actually stupid enough to say that. Doesn't that make you feel good, knowing that this guy is one of the top dogs in the Senate? No wonder this country is in the shape it's in right now. To the gallows with this politician!!!

Anonymous said...

“There have been those for years who just want to get rid of these government-sponsored enterprises,” said Mr Dodd. “I would just remind people in your anxiousness to do that don’t ever forget how important these institutions have been toward the average person in this country getting a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage.”

http://tinyurl.com/64epe2

Anonymous said...

bravo. i take back my comment on your prior link. sorry.