May 09, 2007

HousingPANIC Stupid Question of the Day











Aren't you tired of Bozos?

35 comments:

JAFO said...

Is that the clown from Poltergeist?

JAFO said...

Reminds me of an experiment I conducted with myself a few weeks ago. Try watching all the cheerleaders on CNBC, ridiculous NAR members and various assorted CONgressmen, and imagine them all giving thier quotes and speeches decked out in clown gear. With some imagination it is really fun and helps you put things into perspective. But then again, I am very easily amused.

JAFO

Anonymous said...

I'm not tired of Al and Bozo, but the other two could die tomorrow to make the world a much better place. You can have Bill O'Reilly driving a Ford Pinto when they get run over by a Mac Truck.

Anonymous said...

Sean's fantasy during a wet dream:

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/8519/tjndc55d3d190knfpmlw013ai0.th.jpg

Anonymous said...

Limbaugh is an idiot; Hannity is an idiot; Frankin is a rich liberal who does relate to the strugling American middle-class.

Anonymous said...

How could you include Bozo with these guys? Actually you should exclude Al Franken too. At least his statements are based in fact.

mreynolds

Anonymous said...

Many people don't like to think for themselves, that's why these guys have anyone keeping them in business.

fish said...

re: Sean Hannity:

The phrase golfball and garden hose springs to mind...as it pertains to his devotion to our dear leader....Idiot Mc Figurehead!

machineman said...

A generational shift is taking place in the '08 elections. All of the Boomer pols and talking heads are on their way out - from both parties. The Dems are lucky because a guy named Obama popped up at the right time. He will likely win because of his age and little more.

If the GOP had good leadership, they would foster some younger candidates because their core message still resonates with people who vote with their brains and not their vaginas.

The only reason Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly et al are on the air is they earn money for the networks. All you people who constantly whine about their presence should get a clue. You may not like them, but apparently a lot of your neighbors set their TVs and radios differently. I know that's hard to grasp - people who see the world differently than you - but that is why these guys are in your face every day. Not to worry though, the Dems in Congress will reinstate the "fairness" doctrine soon, and that will pretty much eliminate any political discussions on the internet, radio, and TV. Way to go!

Anonymous said...

nah I still enjot reading your blog

Anonymous said...

more than you will ever know. Ron Paul is the only person speaking the truth, yet he is censored by most media. here is an email i rec'd from craigslist:

Your posting has been flagged for removal.

Approximately 98% of postings removed are in violation of craigslist posting guidelines.

Please make sure you are abiding by all posted site rules, including our terms of use:

http://www.craigslist.org/about/terms.of.use.html

If you need help figuring out why your posting was flagged, try asking in our flag help forum: http://forums.craigslist.org/?forumID=3. Include posting title, body, category, city, how often posted, any images, HTML markup, etc.

If your posting was wrongly flagged down (2% of flagged ads are) please accept our apologies and feel free to repost.

Sorry for the hassle, and thanks for your understanding.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2007-05-08 13:49:00
PostID: 326984825
Title: (rants & raves) Now Yahoo! Censor Popular Support For Ron Paul
Now Yahoo! Censor Popular Support For Ron Paul

ABC forced to address Texas Congressman's campaign, but remain silent on why they scrubbed him from online poll

Paul Joseph Watson?Tuesday, May 8, 2007





Yahoo! News have become the latest establishment media outlet to ignore and censor Ron Paul's presidential campaign, despite the fact that he won Thursday night's GOP debate hands down, according to an overwhelming majority that voted for him in online polls.

Yahoo! News' 2008 Presidential election coverage page features a list of candidates from both Democrat and Republican parties, but fails to list Ron Paul, despite the fact that he easily trounced the likes of Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee and Duncan Hunter - who are featured, in every online poll since Thursday's debate.

Anonymous said...

In his career, Rush has exposed many important stories that the media either refused to or tried to cover up (i.e. the clinton years!)

Ditto's Rush!

burn baby burn said...

It is just not the same since we found out Rush is an impotent drug addict.

txchic57 said...

I think it's Tennessee vs. Tennessee in the '08 election. The Moonshine race! Gore's playing hard to get but I'll bet he runs once it becomes obvious that none of the current dead fish Dems have a chance.

Gore can win if we have a good hurricane season and the sheeple can be distracted from American Idol and Britney's panties long enough to focus on the issues a bit and vote.

Markus Arelius said...

Yes, I'm tired of it.

These jerkoffs are responsible for the petrification and polarization of all Americans.

And we let it happen by not flipping the channel. We've allowed this numbskulls to divide us with labels of "liberal" or "conservative", discarding the truth that we have a federal system and a democratic government.
It is not a theocracy. Americans should question every thing that the government and special interest groups are doing and why they are doing it or not doing it.
There should be active, and constructive debates.

These media meatheads have already taken sides before the first question is even asked. They cannot be trusted to head any forum without substantial bias. Period.

It's just "entertainment" news.
It's b.s.

So before I get flamed with "liberal"-this or "conservative"-that, why is it that we Americans can't peel the onion a few more layers and ask "For what specific issues do you hold conservative or liberal views and why?"

Anonymous said...

>> Actually you should exclude Al Franken too. At least his statements are based in fact.

Get a brain, you moran!

:)

Luv-that-Bush said...

machineman said... The only reason Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly et al are on the air is they earn money for the networks. All you people who constantly whine about their presence should get a clue. You may not like them, but apparently a lot of your neighbors set their TVs and radios differently. I know that's hard to grasp - people who see the world differently than you - but that is why these guys are in your face every day. Not to worry though, the Dems in Congress will reinstate the "fairness" doctrine soon, and that will pretty much eliminate any political discussions on the internet, radio, and TV. Way to go!
May 09, 2007 2:46 PM

I certainly hope they do reinstate the "Fairness Doctrine" again. Give the Progressive Liberals some air time for a change. I have had enough of the Libertarian right wing world improvers nonsense.

Mort said...

Pennywise: They all float down here, they all float.

Anonymous said...

ABC News
CBS News
NBC News
CNN
NY Times
Washington Post
LA Times
Boston Globe
USA Today
98% of Hollywood movies
98% of network TV shows
98% of cable TV shows

vs.

Fox News
Talk Radio

And you imbeciles are complaining that conservatives have too much power in media. Get a clue.

Anonymous said...

Hey....no fair. That photo collage is an insult to Bozo .... guilt by association.

What you need is to replace the photo of Bozo with a photo of a puckering sphincter.

Anonymous said...

Keith,
You are right to put "both sides of the isle" up as Bozos. The sheeple get caught up in the partisan factional debate while, with a few exceptions, both parties are driving the bus over the cliff, BICKERING all the way.

machineman said...

"I certainly hope they do reinstate the "Fairness Doctrine" again. Give the Progressive Liberals some air time for a change. I have had enough of the Libertarian right wing world improvers nonsense."

LOL! You actually believe the Fairness Doctrine will live up to its title? Man are you naive. The law will essentially quash political commentary on popular media -- from both sides. Of course the Marxists who shack up with you liberals will love it. "Yes comrade, a glorious day has dawned in Amerika. Now only State-approved commentary will grace our ears!".

Tell me this, if your "progressive liberals" had a message that resonated with people, why the hell can't they make it in the radio markets where ad revenues are determined by the number of listeners? Air America went bankrupt because nobody listened to it, and Rush pulls in hundreds of millions in ad revenues for the stations he's on. Oh, that's right, it's a big conspiracy with 20 million people a week brainwashed into tuning their radios to Rush -- yup, that's it...

Anonymous said...

ABC News
CBS News
NBC News
CNN
NY Times
Washington Post
LA Times
Boston Globe
USA Today
98% of Hollywood movies
98% of network TV shows
98% of cable TV shows
Fox News
Talk Radio

Basically all the same - pro-growth, pro-consumerism, pro-capitalism, pro-war, neoliberal agenda, pro-housing bubble (before it burst),

Where's the 'left' - NY Times? I don't think so. Where's the dissent - nowhere in the MSM.

Basically there is very little reporting going on these days - more like repeating. They just spew the govmnt/military/business agenda. Even NPR (national petroleum radio) is becoming unbearab;e

You should see what the rest of the world reads/hears - its unbelievable.

Here's where you'll find some real news:
www.informationclearinghouse.info

Wake up zombie americans - there's a whole world out there that hates you!

Anonymous said...

Didn't there used to be a real estate blog with this web address?

Anonymous said...

funny how Rush gets under the skin of communists like Keith. Simple solution dumbass turn the radio off. Oh but to communists that's no solution. To them they have to censor any dissenting opinion. Also the reason kweefie censors posts on his blog, god forbid anyone have a dissenting opinion there too.

Anonymous said...

Anon 5:54:

"Get a brain, you moran!"

Just an observation on my part. Perhaps you should learn to spell the words you direct to others. Otherwise, it makes you look like some kind of moron.

Anonymous said...

Here's where you'll find some real news:
www.informationclearinghouse.info


Ahh yes "real news" which in the minds of liberal idiots = America Evil!!

Anonymous said...

"The only reason Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly et al are on the air is they earn money for the networks."

Gee, thanks for heads up, Sherlock.

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry, but Rush Limbaugh isn't THAT bad to listen to. His show can often be quite funny and irreverent. Granted his politics are very one sided, but as a radio personality, he's really good. The best talk shows are radio people first, political people second, and that's what Rush is. In contrast, Hannity is a blowhard political person who sucks on the radio.

Anonymous said...

I see nobody wanted to hear what Al Franken had to talk (lie) about on his radio show!

Natural Eyebrows said...

Keith, don't you know you have discriminated against women in putting your montage together? Where is Ann Coulter? Where is Laura Ingraham?

Anonymous said...

Give the Progressive Liberals some air time for a change. I have had enough of the Libertarian right wing world improvers nonsense.

As a Libertarian, I don't know what's funnier -- the idea that leftist ideas are such proven losers in the public debate that they can only succeed when government censors the competition and bans their freedom of speech. . . or the fact that a left-wing jackass would claim that the right-wing talk-show-host blowhard asswipes like Hannity and Limbaugh are "libertarian" in any way, shape or form.

I'm sure the person I quoted hates Limbaugh's invective but thinks that Al Franken is just the voice of reason and decorum -- when they (and their brain-dead cultists) are both just flip sides of the same coin.

Hell, at least Limbaugh can make money and doesn't require government bailouts, special censorship laws, and bankruptcy abuse to stay on the air (just look at Air America, the "fairness doctrine," and other such things for evidence of that).

Something also tells me that when the "progressive left" get their "fairness doctrine," there will be plenty of left-wing stuff, some censored right wing stuff ala Hannity, yet not a peep of real libertarianism as part of the debate. The Greens and Libertarians will still be shut out.

After all, "fairness" to the US left usually means "we run the show and you'll like it."

Anonymous said...

Wake up zombie americans - there's a whole world out there that hates you!

Yes, let's be good little socialists and do what everyone else wants us to do so that they love us. I mean, there's no better way to live your life than allowing the loser next door (or down the street) to set your priorities for you so that he doesn't hate you anymore.

"Hatred is bad -- except when it's hatred of Americans, in which case it's not bigotry, but truth because I share it too!"

showmenouns said...

>The only reason Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly et al are on the air is they earn money for the networks.

O'Reilly isn't even in the picture and it wasn't an oversight. Quit marching to the far left talking points you fool. (Why do I ask for things that will never happen?)

kitchenstove said...

LOL, send in the clowns!