tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post2908215222777234028..comments2023-12-30T10:06:37.450+00:00Comments on HousingPANIC - The Housing Bubble Blog with an Attitude Problem, 2005 - 2008: Here's a number you'll never see again in your lifetime: 84% of Americans think the country is on the wrong track. Thank you George W. Bush.bloggerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06585266242070350399noreply@blogger.comBlogger77125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-56546064384822898522008-06-20T22:57:00.000+01:002008-06-20T22:57:00.000+01:00IF ONLY GORE HAD BEEN SWORN IN....*No 911*No decep...IF ONLY GORE HAD BEEN SWORN IN....<BR/><BR/>*No 911<BR/><BR/>*No deceptive/misleading war in Iraq<BR/><BR/>*Budget surpluses from Clinton/Gore administration to be continued under Gore/Libermann resulting in continued strong dollar policy against Eurodollar.<BR/><BR/>*Oil at $28 a barrel<BR/><BR/>*HYDROGEN ENERGY ECONOMIC INFRASTURE RECEIVING MASSIVE GOVT. AND PRIVATE INVESTMENT.(Japan and Germany are halfway in development)<BR/><BR/>*FULL SWING HYDROGEN ECONOMY RESULTS IN ECONOMIC COLLAPSE OF OPEC MEMBER NATIONS.<BR/><BR/>To the 48% who voted for Bush in 2000...........especially Florida...<BR/><BR/>YOU DESERVE YOUR NASTY FORECLOSURES!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-61214173514379304492008-06-19T20:34:00.000+01:002008-06-19T20:34:00.000+01:00"So go ahead Kieth. Call me a fool. Throw all your...<I>"So go ahead Kieth. Call me a fool. Throw all your insults you got at me. And throw your tantrums too. I don't care because I AM RIGHT."</I><BR/><BR/>*trillion dollars wasted -> check<BR/>*<I>riséé</I> of the world -> check<BR/>*more terrorist -> check<BR/>*more croniism with deliberate war -> check<BR/>*fool the idiot voter again -> check<BR/>*still no clue who actually attacked the US on 9/11 -> check<BR/><BR/>Do you vote voluntary or is it time to write a law against it? Depression 2009, you get what you voted for.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-80577011341238036692008-06-19T20:26:00.000+01:002008-06-19T20:26:00.000+01:00"How clueless are those remaining 16%?"If you can ..."<I>How clueless are those remaining 16%?</I>"<BR/><BR/>If you can kill 1 million Iraqis without a blink of an eye and torture everyone at all times, what's so hard on taking voting rights away from the dumbest of the dumb?<BR/><BR/>It should be a no brainer for such a country.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-14934941090680668102008-06-19T01:31:00.000+01:002008-06-19T01:31:00.000+01:00To Anon @ June 18, 11:18PM:Eight of your 9 points ...To Anon @ June 18, 11:18PM:<BR/><BR/>Eight of your 9 points address the reasons for invading Iraq. That's like crying over spilled milk. Yes, we screwed up. Royally. Now what?<BR/><BR/>Well when it comes to fighting a war you never half-effort it. Once we declare war, we've got to have the intestinal fortitude to stick it out. I'm amazed and saddened by our Congress, our media, and much of our country at large for not understanding the full scope of this commitment.<BR/><BR/>Learn the expensive lessons that history has taught us. After the Allies "won" the Great War (no one imagined it would be given the name, "World War 1" yet!) We bugged out and left Germany the bill. The next, more painful, time around, we stuck it out and finished the job right. We helped rebuild and got the Germans and Japanese back on their feet again.<BR/><BR/>Let's not forget this lesson with Iraq.Dogged Americanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15248800914201303643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-66605577385363112552008-06-18T23:49:00.000+01:002008-06-18T23:49:00.000+01:00How many Americans did Bin Laden actually kill? Co...How many Americans did Bin Laden actually kill? <BR/><BR/>Compare that to say the number of Americans who died in the last 8 years to cancer, heart disease, and car accidents. What does that suggest should be the priority to focus on?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-4422258230320582512008-06-18T23:45:00.000+01:002008-06-18T23:45:00.000+01:00Was Clinton in on the right-wing imperialist plan ...Was Clinton in on the right-wing imperialist plan for world domination? What did the world think regarding your item #3?<BR/><BR/>http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-74031362326605299572008-06-18T23:38:00.000+01:002008-06-18T23:38:00.000+01:00Let's start with this one...Saddam violated the Pe...Let's start with this one...<BR/><BR/>Saddam violated the Persian Gulf War Cease Fire Agreement over 150 times. The agreement stated that any hostile violation would be considered an act of war. <BR/><BR/>Remember, I was opposed to the war. I'm just as opposed to our pulling out. Do you want to kill Iraqi civilians? Do you want to be cold and heartless? Pull the troops out.<BR/><BR/>Oh, and this is MOST DEFINITELY about oil. Oh, yes! The Dems are right about that one. Oil is money. Lots and lots of money. It buys things, like Iranian long-range missiles, Russian scientists and flying lessons for terrorists.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-73124879233064673772008-06-18T23:28:00.000+01:002008-06-18T23:28:00.000+01:00I'm normally not overtly arrogant. But endless mor...I'm normally not overtly arrogant. But endless moral equivalency arguments comparing America to Nazi Germany will do it to me every time. Just because you don't hear it on the Mike Malloy Show, doesn't mean these are right-wing talking points. Which of the seven facts I listed three posts ago do you deny? <BR/><BR/>Al-Qaeda has been labeled a terrorist organization by the United Nations Security Council, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Secretary General, the Commission of the European Communities of the European Union, the United States Department of State, the Australian Government, Public Safety Canada, the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan's Diplomatic Bluebook, South Korean Foreign Ministry, the Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service, the United Kingdom Home Office, Pakistan, Russia, the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, and the Swiss Government.<BR/><BR/>I'm not sure Lithuania exists either. I've never been there. I've never met anyone from there. And Mike Malloy never talks about it on his radio program. How real could it possibly be?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-90813280290130181622008-06-18T23:26:00.000+01:002008-06-18T23:26:00.000+01:00DeepCGI, I'll tell you what I see. I see a formerl...DeepCGI, I'll tell you what I see. I see a formerly great country that is squandering it's wealth and future on pointless adventures and interventions in third world nations that are no real threat to America. Is Iran a threat? How? Was Iraq ever a threat? No.<BR/><BR/>Meanwhile, other nations (China for example) are focusing on development and are rapidly growing their economies, infrastructure and productive capacity. A nation of over a billion people is rapidly developing and the US is already a debtor nation to China with no plans for correcting this situation. <BR/><BR/>If America continues down this hyper-militaristic path it will find itself completely bankrupt and a bankrupt nation can not support a hyper-militaristic foreign policy. <BR/><BR/>Do you dispute this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-60706403759325452252008-06-18T23:18:00.000+01:002008-06-18T23:18:00.000+01:00We did not go into Iraq to fight al-Qaeda. The war...<I>We did not go into Iraq to fight al-Qaeda. The war had other purposes.</I><BR/><BR/>Well please elucidate what those purposes were for us, DeepCGI. I've heard everything and I don't know what to believe from the Bush Administration and their fake conservatives apologists.<BR/><BR/>So far we've had:<BR/><BR/>1) Saddam was supporting Al Qaeda. FALSE.<BR/><BR/>2) Saddam was developing nuclear weapons with Niger "yellow cake". FALSE.<BR/><BR/>3) Saddam had WMDs. FALSE.<BR/><BR/>4) Saddam was a brutal dictator. TRUE. But there are brutal dictators all around the world what makes Saddam special? <BR/><BR/>5) For oil. Why are we paying so much for gas? FALSE<BR/><BR/>6) For Israel. MAYBE<BR/><BR/>7) US imperialism and goals to secure the Middle East as layed out in the Project for a New American Century documents. MAYBE<BR/><BR/>8) Al Qaeda in Iraq. Well Al Qaeda wasn't there in 2001. <BR/><BR/>9) Now you're implying that it's to defend against Iran. But Iran is not a threat to the USA. It has not shown any aggression - certainly not on the scale the US has. Let's not forget that it was the US that sponsored terrorism in Iran going back 50 years and overthrew their democratically elected leader.<BR/><BR/>So, instead of throwing fake conservative talking points at us how about you just stick to the basics. Why are we in Iraq and how is the cost justified? And what is Al Qaeda? And why should we believe a word that the discredited and proven liars of the fake conservative movement?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-30059374520462178452008-06-18T23:07:00.000+01:002008-06-18T23:07:00.000+01:00Unfortunately for your argument, I read a hundred ...<I>Unfortunately for your argument, I read a hundred books a year.</I><BR/><BR/><BR/>Well, your mother must be very proud. We all read books you arrogant dipsh!t but you just keep repeating the same right wing bull that we've already heard over and over. These are the same talking points that I hear on the fake conservative radio stations every day. The same sources that have been discredited and exposed as liars over and over again. <BR/><BR/>BTW - What is Al Qaeda exactly? Can you answer that simple question?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-70330835981271452422008-06-18T23:00:00.000+01:002008-06-18T23:00:00.000+01:00The idea of "permanent bases" is a joke. These "p...The idea of "permanent bases" is a joke. These "permanent" bases are a bunch of concrete poured in one place. We have more than a dozen "permanent" bases in Saudi Arabia that have been empty for years. Just ask Osama Bin Laden about that one. Even if we entirely pull out, the Iraqis will please ask Obama to please keep a number of them operational. Watch and see. If Bush is just an imperialistic fascist, he's not very thorough or effective. Pay attention. Reread my posts more slowly. Maybe you'll learn something. You are lucky I even bother with you people. I guess I'm justing having a good time, here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-42494436809468992002008-06-18T22:51:00.000+01:002008-06-18T22:51:00.000+01:00Iraq is a three-front war -- against Sunni al-Qaed...Iraq is a three-front war -- against Sunni al-Qaeda, against Shiite militias and against Iranian hegemony -- and we are winning on every front:<BR/><BR/>-- We did not go into Iraq to fight al-Qaeda. The war had other purposes. But al-Qaeda chose to turn it into the central front in its war against America. That choice turned into an al-Qaeda fiasco: al-Qaeda in Iraq is now on the run and in the midst of stunning and humiliating defeat.<BR/><BR/>-- As for the Shiite extremists, the Mahdi Army is isolated and at its weakest point in years.<BR/><BR/>-- Its sponsor, Iran, has suffered major setbacks, not just in Basra, but in Iraqi public opinion, which has rallied to the Maliki government and against Iranian interference through its Sadrist proxy.<BR/><BR/>Even the most expansive American objective -- establishing a representative government that is an ally against jihadists, both Sunni and Shiite -- is within sight. <BR/><BR/>Unfortunately for your argument, I read a hundred books a year.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-32097834386687056582008-06-18T22:45:00.000+01:002008-06-18T22:45:00.000+01:00Admit it. You want us to lose. You hate America. Y...<I>Admit it. You want us to lose. You hate America. You won't admit that we buy Iraqi oil at OPEC prices. You won't admit that we will turn over power to the Iraqi government at the time of victory. And most importantly, you won't place the blame for the majority of Iraqi casualties on insurgents who target civilians or allow civilian casualties for the purpose of defeating the USA.</I><BR/><BR/><BR/>DeepCGI, you are so mentally retarded that it's very frustrating arguing with you. <BR/><BR/>You keep speaking of this victory in Iraq. What is this victory that you speak of? If it's destroying every last remnant of Al Qaeda in Iraq I would counter with Al Qaeda was never a problem in Iraq before Bush and his boyz decided to level the country and build those (58) permanent bases. Now with those permanent bases and a permanent military presence in Iraq do you really think attacks on US forces are going to end as long as that permanent US presence is there? How is that possible? How is that winning?<BR/><BR/>Insurgents? What is an insurgent exactly? It sounds like a very clinical term for resistance fighter and the fighters between the various religious sects in Iraq. Were there insurgents before Bushes invasion? No.<BR/><BR/>According to Bush and the fake conservative Kool-Aid drinkers, we "won" in Iraq back when he declared "Mission Accomplished" so how can we believe the propaganda from the same people now who say "the surge is working" and we've won in Iraq? This is from the same people that sold the war on Iraq with a carefully planned propaganda campaign of lies. How can we believe them now? They should be in prison as war criminals not applauded as "winning" this so called "war". <BR/><BR/>And what is Al Qaeda while we're at it. Define it for me in detail. Then explain how Al Qaeda is such a threat to the USA and then explain what their motivations are. When you can clearly define Al Qaeda and prove that they are a real threat to civilization then maybe the trillions spent on these wars and defense spending can be justified - except even in that case they can't because Iraq had no Al Qaeda.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-76084976804309440032008-06-18T22:06:00.000+01:002008-06-18T22:06:00.000+01:00Too early to say? I'm drinking the faux conservat...Too early to say? I'm drinking the faux conservative koolaid?<BR/><BR/>Here is the "nothing" that Iraqis have been doing in the last few months:<BR/><BR/>1. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki sent the Iraqi army into Basra. It achieved in a few weeks what the British had failed to do in four years: take the city, drive out the Mahdi Army and seize the ports from Iranian-backed militias.<BR/><BR/>2. When Mahdi fighters rose up in support of their Basra brethren, the Iraqi army at Maliki's direction confronted them and prevailed in every town -- Najaf, Karbala, Hilla, Kut, Nasiriyah and Diwaniyah -- from Basra to Baghdad.<BR/><BR/>3. Without any American ground forces, the Iraqi army entered and occupied Sadr City, the Mahdi Army stronghold.<BR/><BR/>4. Maliki flew to Mosul, directing a joint Iraqi-U.S. offensive against the last redoubt of al-Qaeda, which had already been driven out of Anbar, Baghdad and Diyala provinces.<BR/><BR/>5. The Iraqi parliament enacted a de-Baathification law, a major Democratic benchmark for political reconciliation.<BR/><BR/>6. Parliament also passed the other reconciliation benchmarks -- a pension law, an amnesty law, and a provincial elections and powers law. Oil revenues are being distributed to the provinces through the annual budget.<BR/><BR/>7. With Maliki having demonstrated that he would fight not just Sunni insurgents (e.g., in Mosul) but Shiite militias (e.g., the Mahdi Army), the Sunni parliamentary bloc began negotiations to join the Shiite-led government. (The final sticking point is a squabble over a sixth Cabinet position.) <BR/><BR/>Admit it. You want us to lose. You hate America. You won't admit that we buy Iraqi oil at OPEC prices. You won't admit that we will turn over power to the Iraqi government at the time of victory. And most importantly, you won't place the blame for the majority of Iraqi casualties on insurgents who target civilians or allow civilian casualties for the purpose of defeating the USA. How's the left-wing Koolaid?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-88602489370426091482008-06-18T21:41:00.000+01:002008-06-18T21:41:00.000+01:00Fighting Words from Mike GravelThe Faux Conservati...<A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uS6cjD_YfU" REL="nofollow">Fighting Words from Mike Gravel</A><BR/><BR/>The Faux Conservatives are so predictable that I know what they'll say:<BR/><BR/>"Who cares what that this America hating kook says?! F*&@ing liberal! George Bush is saving us from the terrorists!! Support the troops!! Support the war and support the continued unnecessary deaths of our troops!! Support the continued wasteful spending on the war and foreign intervention and the destruction of the dollar!! Freedom ain't free!! Eeerrrgghh!! It's Miller time and Hannity is on in 5 minutes! God Bless America!!! Yeeeaaahhh!! U S A!! U S A!!"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-30260251155039438272008-06-18T20:59:00.000+01:002008-06-18T20:59:00.000+01:00"Harry S. Truman - lowest approval rating. 23%. Th..."Harry S. Truman - lowest approval rating. 23%. The worst president ever, according to polls."<BR/><BR/>Can you even IMAGINE giving Bushco-Cheneyburton the button for the bomb?<BR/><BR/>That poll cited above IS WRONG.<BR/><BR/>George W. Bush - WORST EVER.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-48499809142405244922008-06-18T19:56:00.000+01:002008-06-18T19:56:00.000+01:00I think Ron Paul makes the case pretty clear right...I think Ron Paul makes the case pretty clear right here:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyxNXEHfaXk&eurl=http://www.ronpaulforpresident2008.com/news/" REL="nofollow">Ron Paul puts Fake Conservatives to Shame on Morning Joe</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-47184508860898871242008-06-18T19:21:00.000+01:002008-06-18T19:21:00.000+01:00Amen, Keith. I hear ya. Bush & Co. looting of the ...Amen, Keith. I hear ya. Bush & Co. looting of the U.S. and the world could not have gone any more perfectly. Billions upon billions of dollars flow fast and furious from the Treasury (yes, those are our tax dollars) into the deregulated corporations, corporations that have absolutely no allegiance to the citizens of this country (or any other, for that matter), leaving us, the American people, with nothing but a big ass bill and an empty shell of a country, too broke and riddled with debt to function as the great nation it once was. Too bad the American public is too stupid to grasp this realty. Instead, Americans watch the so-called "news" on the TV machine and consider themselves "informed". ROTFLMAO! Distracted by corporate propaganda and out right lies, Bush & Co. have freely gutted the United States. They could not have planned and executed this any more perfectly. Mission accomplished.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-34561885377132694902008-06-18T19:05:00.000+01:002008-06-18T19:05:00.000+01:00One thing I do admire about Bush is he doesn't giv...<I>One thing I do admire about Bush is he doesn't give a fuck what you think. I don't agree with much of what he has done his 2nd term, but so be it it. That's how the system works.<BR/><BR/>You elect a president for a 4 year term to do what he thinks is right. You don't elect a president to do whatever the latest poll says.</I><BR/><BR/><BR/>That's interesting. I thought a president was elected to fulfill the role of the executive arm of the government and obey the Constitution. Not be a dictator that does whatever he thinks is right for four years. <BR/><BR/>You fake conservatives are too stupid to function and you're an embarassment to the legacy of the Republican party.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-89955254574821073312008-06-18T19:03:00.000+01:002008-06-18T19:03:00.000+01:00but that is the power of their position. there rea...<I>but that is the power of their position. there really isn't anything to win, we don't fight wars to "win" something. what did we win in WWII? land in europe? We "win" the "defeating" of the enemy, which is really difficult to define when your enemy lives and hides amongst women and children and doesn't wear a uniform or have visible leadership.</I><BR/><BR/><BR/>OMG you're such a dolt! That exactly proves my point. In WWII there was a real and present danger the Nazis and their formidable war machine. They were an aggressive invading enemy. How does that compare to Iraq? Where is the real and present danger there? When was Iraq ever a threat to America? Where's their army and military might. <BR/><BR/>In WWII there was victory over an aggressive and powerful military and ideological force. Iraq does not compare in any way. <BR/><BR/>You'll probably say well we're fighting Al Qaeda. There was no Al Qaeda in Iraq before the US invaded. And what is Al Qaeda anyway? A small ragtag bunch of third world Arabs with no wealth, no military might, no real organization that we're supposed to be terrified of? As far as I can tell Al Qaeda is just a label for any arab or muslim that is outraged at US and Israeli foreign policy and resists it. It's not a shadowy organization of interconnected terror cells that share secret handshakes and report to their shadowy leader Osama Bin Laden. It's ridiculous. <BR/><BR/>The point is that the Nazis were a very real and defineable threat. What the hell is Al Qaeda? Can anybody tell me?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-56825059095911397872008-06-18T18:36:00.000+01:002008-06-18T18:36:00.000+01:00George W. Bush - highest approval rating. Ever. 90...George W. Bush - highest approval rating. Ever. 90%. Currently at 29% and as expected, HPers are already mistaking the 16% "right track" poll numbers as Bush approval numbers. Nice solid C work there, gang.<BR/>Harry S. Truman - lowest approval rating. 23%. The worst president ever, according to polls.<BR/><BR/>The right track/wrong track is just a reflection of the effect of the MSM and public schools. Everyone is feeling bad, and they don't realize they've been prodded like cattle in that direction. It really is scary, scarier than Kerry and Osama-bama, even.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-61927252893577982982008-06-18T18:23:00.000+01:002008-06-18T18:23:00.000+01:00"Yeah, but the priority in ultraliberal bankrupt C..."Yeah, but the priority in ultraliberal bankrupt California is gay marriage. The country and that state are falling apart but their priority is having the queens married.<BR/><BR/>Why HP never addressed the topic that gays help to inflate the housing market through over speculation? It was even an episode of Will & Grace."<BR/><BR/>The only reason it is such a big deal is because of the dopey GOP and the ultra-right wing christian do-gooders (that are raping little boys in their basements while chastising everyone else's lifestyle in public) making it such a big deal with their ridiculus "lets make an ammendment stating that marriage is between a man and a woman". WHO CARES! Seriously! What a couple, be it man and woman, man and man, woman and woman does in their personal life does not concern me. What concerns me is when neo-conservatives make too big of a stink about something. That usually means they are hiding something OF REAL CONCERN under the radar and fogging everyone's lenses with something ridiculus like that gay marriage prohibition nonsense.<BR/><BR/>I would much rather have a functioning economy, good energy policy, no war and gay marriage. People - the backlash is coming, and I agree with Keith, this November is going to be a bloodbath for the GOP. After November, the neocons, the far right nuts and bible bangers, hillbillies etc. that all are worried about gay marriage and banning stem cell research are going back to the stone ages where they belong, while people actually interested in fixing REAL problems might get a chance at the helm.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-78916891094855650122008-06-18T18:14:00.000+01:002008-06-18T18:14:00.000+01:00Mr. Flibble,The balanced budget thing is ironic co...Mr. Flibble,<BR/><BR/>The balanced budget thing is ironic considering the conservative savior/shitheel Reagan made a balanced budget amendment the cornerstone of his brainstem agenda. Of course he never achieved one, it took CLINTON to do it.<BR/><BR/>And isn't it funny how the balanced budget disappeared from the conservative agenda once republicans took control of Congress? Sort of like term limits. Oh sure, the republicans had their brainstem followers all hopped up on term limits when the dems controlled Congress but you didn't hear much about that once republicans took hold of the reins.<BR/><BR/>Republicans are the scum of the earth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18675105.post-21527445349463050602008-06-18T18:06:00.000+01:002008-06-18T18:06:00.000+01:00If we're only close to hitting the bottom (and sha...If we're only close to hitting the bottom (and shame on you for calling bottom - you should know better) then we will see 84% again in our lifetime - on the way back up. Unless you're saying we'll never drop below 84% again. That would be pretty bad! But possible...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com